In 2010 the electorate for the most part was seeking
citizen legislators, not politicians.
Legislators who would work for what they said they believed: limited, accountable government. The record after two years is disappointing.
Never to see the light of day were a number of bills the
Republican majority in the House of Representatives passed, only to languish in
the Democratic-controlled Senate. When
it counted most though our hopes were dashed as political expediency once again
prevailed.
Each bill offers up crumbs to be brought home and held up
proudly as evidence of positive representation and service to the
constituency. The bad things they say
“would have been worse had we not been there to moderate the effects.”
An example is the recently passed highway bill, known as
HR 4348, “To provide an extension of Federal-aid highway, highway safety, motor
carrier safety, transit and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund
pending enactment of a multiyear law reauthorizing such programs, and for other
purposes.”
What they said they would do:
We will end the practice of packaging
unpopular bills with “must-pass” legislation.
We will advance major legislation one issue at a time.
What they did:
The 27-month
transportation bill includes a 5-year flood insurance extension and a one year
extension of subsidized student loans.
What they said they would do:
“Read the bill” and post legislation
for 72 hours prior to a vote?
What they did:
Indicating a
lack of resolve, significant bills are routinely passed just as members are
leaving town. With over 1300 pages,
reading is unlikely and posting for 72 hours is impossible.
What they said they would do:
Reduce the deficit and pay-as-you go.
What they did:
The bill
pays for 27 months of road funding with ten years of budget savings and revenue
measures which include dipping into the general fund and exposing taxpayers to
liability for under-funded pension plans.
In another two years, this process will be repeated to continue funding
the Highway Transportation Fund.
What they said they would do:
Work toward reducing the size and scope of
government.
What they did:
By
reauthorizing subsidized student loans, the day of any reductions in government
over-reach is postponed.
The first steps toward limited government may be the most
difficult, but if you don’t take them you will never get there. Fifty-two Republicans took those first steps
by voting “no” on this extravagant bill.
Rand Paul took a stand for women's rights!
ReplyDeleteHe even bottlenecked some flood insurance bill giving old Harry Reid a fistfull of it with his rider: a Sanctity of Life forerunner. Right ON!
The Paul's CARE about the preborn and not reducing respect for a woman's right to protect and bear pre-born children. It is nice to see a man so high pro-file make a risky political move, because when prince charming lets you down and sends you to the supermarket to get Plan B---as a woman in crisis you know there's at least one man in politics speaking up for the woman's right to CHOOSE LIFE!
OMG--wait a second--lol--I think this was the bill.
ReplyDeleteI get it now. Doubly impressive--I've said it before and I'll say it again: ~Ron Paul • 2012~
More on the Bill:
ReplyDeletehttp://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/235621-house-passes-highway-student-loan-flood-insurance-bill
More on Rand Paul's defensive efforts:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/rand-paul-wont-allow-vote-on-flood-insurance-until-senate-votes-on-when-life-begins/
Excellent write up dude you have shared in this post..!! I still impressed to get this post allocation. Thanks and keep it up...
ReplyDeleteHome insurance